To facilitate the same the government has asked states to change
their APMC Act (which required all agricultural products to be sold
only in government regulated markets) and linked credit flow to the
same capital investment subsidy for renovation of godowns and setting
up farm marketing infrastructure will only be given to states that
have amended the APMC Act. Fourteen states and four Union Territories
have already amended the APMC Act which allows farmers to sell their
produce directly to buyers. Meanwhile, another six states have
undertaken partial reforms and 13 states along with three Union
Territories have initiated action on the reforms front.
Contract Farming
Despite
India's leading position in world production, it lags behind in
productivity (yields). In fact, though India ranks second in rice and
wheat production, in terms of yield/hectare it ranks 52 (rice) and 38
(wheat). For pulses the productivity levels drop even further. Despite
being the highest producer of pulses in the world, India ranks 138 in
terms of productivity. To improve yields in agriculture, the
government has allowed the private sector to undertake contract
farming. This, the government believes will result in increase in seed
replacement (from 12% to 20%), farm mechanization (from 25% to 40%),
fertilizer (NPK) use (from 91.5 kg/ha to 160 kg/ha) and IPM coverage
(from 5% to 15%) apart from improving cropping intensity from 134% to
145%. According to the Agricultural Ministry, reforms in the
agricultural sector are likely to see total food grain production rise
from 203.41m ton in 2000-01 to 320.0m ton by 2011- 12, registering an
annual growth of over 4%, while for horticultural produce the growth
would be even higher from 152.5m ton in 2000-01 to 300m ton in
2011-12, a growth of over 6% p.a.
Allowing corporates to undertake contract farming has seen the entry
of large players like PepsiCo India Holdings, Bharti TeleVentures, HLL
(which works in consortium with Rallis which provides agri-inputs and
know how and ICICI which gives farm credit), Tata, DCM Shriram and
McDonald's among others. In the case of PepsiCo, which has 75,000 acre
of holdings across states on which nearly 200 farmers grow corn,
tomatoes, basmati and potatoes, contract farming led to savings of
20-30% apart from ensuring steady and adequate supply of raw material
for its food processing plants. In fact, PepsiCo's foray into contract
farming in Punjab was on account of inadequate supply the company
required 40,000 ton of tomatoes over 55 days to operate its tomato
processing plant but the state could provide only 28,000 tons in one
season (28 days).
However, the total area currently under contract farming covers only 7
million acres of the total cultivable land of 400 million acres,
accounting for less than 2%. And even this figure drops to 200,000
acres if only corporate contracts are considered. While contract
farming is attracting more players like Reliance Industries, retail
chains like Big Bazzar and Metro, the challenge will be to integrate
farmers as benefits of scale and technology can be achieved only on
minimum 3-4 acre plots.
Supply chain management: key to profit
maximization
The long
supply chain starting from harvesting, packing, grading,
transportation, storage, wholesale and finally retail sale involves
very little value addition but huge losses in terms of wastage (15-25%
is lost by the time the produce reaches the retail level). In value
terms, the wastage in food grains (including post harvest losses) is
estimated at over Rs50,000 crore a year. For fruits and vegetables
(where post harvest loss is higher at 25-30%) it is estimated at over
Rs 23,000 crores.
Further, despite little or no value addition, the price of the
commodity increases by nearly 100% from the farm-gate to the retail
stage, with neither the farmer nor the consumer benefiting. The share
of the rice grower in the final price paid by the consumer is usually
not more than 44-47%. And for fruits and vegetables the farm gate
price as percentage of retail price is even lower at 25% compared to
70% in USA. According to a study conducted by Rabo India Finance,
farmers share could increase to 33% of total revenues on an average
after disintermediation in the supply chain, while consumers would
save 10% of their spends on food if supply chain efficiencies were
improved.
Terminal market complexes: As a step
towards reducing wastage and increasing share of producers in price,
the government has encouraged corporates to set up TMCs. TMCs offer
multiple choice to farmers such as electronic auctioning and direct
sale to exporters, processors and retail chains under one roof. In
addition wastage is reduced as TMCs provide storage infrastructure
(giving participants the choice to trade at a future date), logistics
support including transport and cold chain services and cleaning
grading and packing support to farmers. The TMCs would operate on a
Hub & Spoke format with the TMC (the Hub) linked to a number of
collection centers (the Spokes) located at key production centers.
Corporates that have expressed interest to set up TMCs include
Reliance Industries and ITC, which plan to invest between Rs60 crore
to Rs120 crore on each TMC. In all, eight TMCs are likely to be set up
in centres like Mumbai, Nasik, Patna, Chandigarh, Rai (Haryana),
Bhopal, Nagpur and Kolkata. The area covered would vary from 200 acres
(for Mumbai) to 55 acres (Kolkata). And the handling capacity in each
TMC would range from 200,000 ton to 600,000 ton (for Mumbai) a year.
Information technology to aid growth
The
Agricultural Ministry with the help of the National Informatics Centre
has promoted on-lineagricultural markets for crops and horticultural
produce.
Agmarknet: To ensure that farmers get a
fair price for crops, the Agmarknet has sought to network all major
agricultural producer markets, agricultural marketing boards and
departments and wholesale markets in the country. Along the same lines
it has also promoted Hortnet a horticulture informatics network
(though this has been taken up on a turnkey basis with the hub having
been set up at the National Horticultural Board, Gurgaon, to which 33
countrywide market centers of the Board areconnected. Prices and
arrivals of fruits and vegetables are received by NHB on a daily basis
from the 33 centres. To improve productivity at the farm level and
help in efficient dissemination of information it has also set up a
crops informatics network (Cropsnet), a plant protection network (PPIN)
and a fertilizer informatics network (Fertnet).
The
success of introducing IT in agricultural marketing can be gauged from
the fact that Agmarknet, which has set a target of connecting 2810
market nodes in the 10th plan, has already connected 2408 nodes.
E-choupal: ITC has also made a significant
contribution to the growth of e-markets. ITC's echoupal network is
today the largest network in the country with over 6,000 kiosks in
operation. It has already connected more than 30,000 villages across
six states and is growing at a hectic pace, entering 30 new villages a
day. In recognition of its contribution to the field of information
technology, the company recently received the prestigious Development
Gateway Award, an international award recognizing outstanding
achievement in the application of information and communication
technologies.
Commodity markets have provided price transparency
Multi-commodity exchanges like MCX, NCDEX and NMCEIL, which have seen
rapid growth since 2003, have provided greater price transparency in
agro commodities by putting producers, end-users and retail investors
on the same platform and aid in price discovery. Currently, over 70
agri commodities are actively traded on the multi-commodity exchanges
with average daily trading volumes at times crossing volumes in
capital market futures in August 2005, volumes on the MCX crossed
Rs10,000 crore. MCX has also set up the country's first National Spot
Exchange for Agricultural Produce (NSEAP) along with NAFED (National
Agriculture Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd), which
connects all APMC markets of India electronically.
Food processing: moving up the value chain
The turnover of the total food market in India is estimated at
Rs250,000 crore (US$69.4 billion) according to a recent
Mckinsey-CII study, but processed food accounts for only
Rs80,000 crore or 32% of the food market. This is because
India processes less than 2% of its horticultural produce
(fruits and vegetables) compared to 70% in Brazil and 78% in
the Philippines as per data published by the Planning
Commission in January 2005. Further, with value addition
languishing at 7% vis a vis countries like China where it is
23% and Philippines where it is 45%, the scope for growth in
this sector is enormous. In fact, going by CII estimates, the
sector is expected to grow at a rate of 9-12% per annum on the
back of 6-8% growth in GDP. According to a Mckinsey-CII study
the food processing sector is likely to attract investments of
Rs150,000 crore (US$33 billion) over the next 10 years. The
Ministry of Food Processing expects investments in food
processing to act as a catalyst and improve the share of value
addition to 35% by 2015, improving the level of processing to
20% over the same time frame.
Sensing the sector's potential, the government has offered
several sops to the industry apart from liberalizing the
sector (licensing has been abolished for almost all kinds of
food processing except for some products like beer, liquor,
cane sugar and automatic approvals are granted for 51% of
foreign equity or 100% for ventures set up by NRIs/OCBs). Next
on the government's agenda is to set up agrizones and mega
food parks. To implement the Food Parks Scheme the Ministry of
Agriculture has already released Rs105.22 crore (US$23
million) as assistance and has so far approved setting up of
100 food parks throughout the country of which it plans to
back 50. Meanwhile, 20 mega parks are being set up in various
cities primarily to attract FDI. The Centre plans to give Rs
100 crore (US$22 billion) by way of subsidy for setting up
such mega food processing parks.
Organized retail will provide further
impetus
Ernst & Young ranks India's retail sector first among emerging
markets for international retail. According to Ernst & Young,
though the organized sector constitutes only 3% of the $230
billion Indian retail market, it is expected to grow 400%from
$7 billion currently to over $30 billion by 2010.
Interestingly, hypermarkets will drive most of this growth.
Considering that hypermarkets account for a share of over 50%
in retail distribution of food in developed countries, the
growth in hypermarkets would in turn drive agri commodity and
processed food sales. In fact, over the next 5-6 years food
and grocery revenues of the organized retail sector are likely
to multiply five-fold according to Cris Infac, capturing a 30%
share of the domestic food and grocery market as against 1%
currently.
The growth in hypermarkets is not confined to urban areas
alone. For instance, ITC, the first company to set up a rural
mall at Sehore in MP, was spurred by its success and now plans
to open 30 more such malls (each costing Rs5 crore on an
average) in 2005-06, in synergy with its fast growing e-choupal
network. Of the 30, nine malls (three each in Maharashtra,
Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh) are likely to be opened
within the next few months.
Until now, lack of investments had hampered the growth of
agriculture and food-processing in India. But with the
government according both these sectors priority status, this
is set to change. Investments in both these sectors and in
supply-chain management have started pouring in and it's only
a matter of time before the India emerges as a significant
player in agriculture and food-processing sectors. |
Time to Revisit
The Indian economy is booming,
stock markets are buoyant,
homegrown entrepreneurs are
spreading their wings, exports are
growing, and consumerism is
rising. In this scenario, it is
definitely worth revisiting the issue
of full Capital Account
Convertibility (CAC). Most likely,
CAC would improve the business
environment, giving Indian industry access to lost-cost capital and the economy more options for asset
allocation, bringing in higher
inflows and improving the confidence level among foreign investors.
But is the time right?
When Global imbalances are worsening, commodities are in strong bull cycle, interest rates are rising all over the globe, inflation is looming and asset markets sky rocketing, will introduction of full CAC will bring desired results?
Answer lies in India’s approach…
Though RBI is revisiting the issue of capital account convertibility again after 1997, it will still favor a phased roll out of full CAC in India - probably a time horizon of next 3-4 years- due to its concerns over inflation, quality of credit growth, rising interest rates and some asset markets. The finance minister too does not foresee a full convertibility of rupee before 2009 when India’s revenue deficit could have been be wiped out and fiscal deficit could have been brought down to 3%.
The things have changed.
The fundamentals of Indian economies has changed significantly since RBI first appointed S S Tarapore Committee in 1997 to study Capital Account Convertibility (CAC) issue taking guidance from 1997 Union Budget Speech. At that time, the GDP was growing at lackluster pace of 5% against 8.1% projected for 2005-06. The center’s gross fiscal deficit was also hovering around 5% against 4.1% today. Compare to foreign exchange reserve of USD 26 billion (covering 7 month import) in 1997; India’s foreign exchange reserve currently stands at more than USD 150 billion. Non-performing assets of banks, then at double digits (~14% in 1997) too have come down to below 5% today and to allow greater flexibility to banks the Cash reserve ratio has been lowered from 9% in 1997 to 5% in 2005.
India’s manufacturing exports has also grown from USD 35 billion in 1997-98 to USD +100 billion in 2005-06 whereas its IT & related services exports has grown from less than USD 2 billion in 1997-98 to USD +23 billion in 2005-06. Not only that, India has emerged as one of the most significant global players in IT/ ITES related exports. India is also gaining momentum in manufacturing exports mainly in the areas of Textiles, Auto ancillaries, Engineering and Specialty chemicals. India’s +1 billion population, with young age bias, rising income & growing middle class have also fueled consumption led growth making Indian economy more resilient.
Though in 1997 Tarapore Committee came out with a report laying pre-conditions for CAC by year 1999-2000, the issue of CAC was put on the back burner due to precipitation of financial crisis in South East Asia soon after (blamed to CAC of those countries). Recently RBI has again appointed a committee to set out the framework for fuller CAC, in response to the government’s declaration of revisit the CAC issue. Due to significant improvement of India’s macro fundamentals, most of the pre-conditions laid by 1997 Tarapore committee has already been achieved. (See “Road Map to CAC”)
Progress so far
Though East Asian Crisis put the government’s plan to adopt full CAC on hold, India has achieved a significant progress towards partly CAC since 1997.some of the measures recommended by Tarapore Committee in 1997.For, example, Tarapore Committee recommended that Indian Corporates should be allowed to invest up to USD 50 million in direct investment abroad, where as per present guideline, Indian Corporates can make overseas investments up to 200% their net worth under automatic route. And see the way this facility is used by Indian corporates today: Just in one quarter (first quarter of 2006), Indian companies have acquired more than USD 3 billion worth foreign entities. The overseas borrowings / fund raising by Indian corporates have also been liberalized up to certain extent but with few restrictions like overall cap, company level cap, minimum maturity, and end use. The FDI route is also now open for most of the sectors (retail trading, atomic energy, lottery business, gambling, agriculture and plantations being exceptions) with sectoral cap on few sectors.
However, capital account is still restricted for banks and individual to a large extent. For individuals, there are caps on spending limits for various purposed like foreign travel, foreign education, overseas medical treatment, etc. Individuals too have limited options to invest in overseas assets as the annual limit is US$ 25,000 per individual for overseas investment. Banks are also not allowed to raise fund through ECBs and only allowed to borrow upto 25% of tier I capital that again with certain restrictions. Along with restrictions on borrowings, there are restrictions on assets side too with banks’s money market investment restricted to USD 10 million and debt market investment restricted to USD 25 million.
Why fiscal discipline is important
Success of CAC depends on balanced flow of forex, and for developing countries like India, it means attaining the right balance between exports and consumption led growth, and ensuring adequate investment in infrastructure and new capacities. (See “How India’s forex requirement is balanced”)
It has also become an imperative for India to invest continuously in infrastructure and capacities to attain the higher economic growth. India is relying on three main sources for its investment needs namely foreign investment, domestic savings, and government. Though foreign portfolio investment strong so far in India, foreign direct investment has not picked up compared to other Asian countries. Domestic savings were at 29.1% GDP in 2004-05 but due to strong consumption led credit off take, significant portion of domestic savings are diverted away from investment In this scenario, government’s role to fund India’s investment requirement, particularly in infrastructure sector, is very important. And that is where importance of fiscal discipline comes in to play. The large revenue deficit means increasingly borrowing to finance current expenditure of government rather than investing in growth. It holds the economy back by crowding out private investment, imposing heavy burden on the budget and using the resources that can be directed towards development needs. (See “How India’s Public debt/GDP compares with others”). That is why though our deficit has come down, our finance minister is also not foreseeing a full convertibility of rupee before 2009 when India’s revenue deficit could have been be wiped out and fiscal deficit could have been brought down to 3%(See “Central Government’s fiscal and revenue deficits”).
Benefits
Experience of few emerging markets suggests that a move towards full CAC could result into large capital inflows and can trigger appreciation of the exchange rate. Strong inflows can definitely have positive effects on economic growth but it also requires a very healthy financial system. Two obvious benefits of a CAC will be reduction in cost of capital and access to larger capital for India corporate At a time when India requires an imnvestment of US$ 1.5 trillion over the next five years to accelerate its growth to +10% from the current 8%, higher capital flows are definitely welcome.
Full CAC will also allow Indian corporates having operations in multiple countries to effectively hedge their risks. Full CAC will also open overseas asset markets for Indian investors/companies thus can provide them with more options and better portfolio diversification. In fact with cross border integration of global markets, capital controls over longer periods are infact costly, ineffective and distortive. A gradual appreciation of Rupee coupled with removal of infrastructure bottlenecks and productivity increase will sustain India’s competitiveness in exports markets coupled with reduction in import bill thus having positive effect on the trade deficit. A gradual appreciation of Rupee will also have a positive effect on inflation and government’s oil subsidies as oil accounts for 30% India’s import. However there are certain external risks which India faces and can result into strong capital out flow (See “Factors that can spoil party”).

Conclusion
A full capital account convertibility will definitely be a welcome move that expected to result into larger inflows of foreign savings and investments at a time when India is needing it the most. But fiscal discipline and safeguards are needed to be in place before that happens.
by Manish Marwah
|